Thursday, January 31, 2013

Nipple-Bottomed Reeboks Freak Out The Internet

What you see above is not a piece of Martian footwear â€" rather, it's the Reebok ATV 19+, an "all-terrain vehicle for your feet" that goes on sale for $140 on Feb. 1.

The shoe became a minor viral sensation on the sports side of the web Thursday after photos began to circulate. A Reddit thread titled "Reebok has lost it" made the social network's front page, as many debated the shoe's rather oddly designed soles.

Admittedly, the ATV 19+ does have a weird space-nipple look. But read on to see why there may be more to that strange appearance than first meets the eye â€" and why its outer-space vibe is no coincidence.

Bill McInnis â€" Reebok's head of advanced innovation who helped design the ATV 19+ â€" is a former NASA scientist. The 19 bumps on the bottom of the shoe are designed to grip as much terrain as possible each time you move. In other words, the shoe can mimic how a real-life ATV dominates anything under its wheels.

"This digs right through the top layer of a surface and gets traction on that layer underneath," McInnis says in the video below.

Check out the full clip below for more on the technology behind this funky-looking footwear. Then let us know in the comments â€" would you wear these shoes?

Photos courtesy of Reebok

Read More

Vineit Lets You Easily Share Vine Videos on Tumblr

Vineit is a new tool that lets you share videos from Twitter's video sharing service Vine on Tumblr.

Vineit is very simple to use: open the project's homepage, and drag the "Vineit" button to your bookmarks toolbar. Then, when you see a vine video, simply click on that link, and you'll share it on Tumblr.

If there are no Vine videos on the page, the tool will return an error.

Marrying Tumblr and Vine is a logical step, since Tumblr has become the go-to service for images and animated gifs (usually surrounding a certain topic), and we don't doubt many users will find it helpful.

Vineit joins the fast-growing army of Vine-related tools. For example, VineGifR is a Mac app that turns a Vine URL into an animated GIF file, and Just Vined is a page that lets you see the last 20 videos posted on Vine.

Photo by Emily Price, Mashable

Read More

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Lessons From 4 Killer UGC Campaigns

This post originally appeared on the American Express OPEN Forum, where Mashable regularly contributes articles about leveraging social media and technology in small business.

Burberry's Art of the Trench campaign redefined UGC in the digital era. It's simple, really â€" the best way to show how great your product is is to show real, fashionable people wearing your product ... and looking damn good doing so. Since the Trench site launched in 2009 (it's still a living project today), several other brands have sought to integrate UGC into their marketing tactics and business model.

Last summer, apparel company Free People began integrating consumer Instagram photos onto product pages for its denim jeans. Doritos put its Super Bowl commercials in the hands of chip eaters â€" and it worked. Ray-Ban worked with Breakfast to create "mosaic" billboards in real time by pulling in Instagrams from a three-day music festival (see below).

UGC campaigns are an excellent way to collect creative material for marketing purposes, to get photos of your products on the social web and to drive sales and brand engagement. And images can be especially useful in driving apparel sales â€" Free People and Rent the Runway include UGC on their site to show products on real people. Luis Sanz, co-founder of photo aggregator Olapic, says customers engage more with photos than with text reviews, which could lead to to a 5x increase in interactions. Conversion rates on product pages that include customer photos can increase up to 30%.

"Lots of ecommerce customers end up not buying a product because they’re not sure how the product is going to fit after they make the purchase," says Jose de Cabo of Olapic, which Free People used to pull photos for the site. "It also shows they have a super hip, engaged customer base," he added.

Marketing with UGC will vary based on the type of business and also the laws surrounding content rights in various states. Below, we've rounded up four brands who've used UGC in interesting ways, and we've offered lessons that you can apply to your marketing efforts.

1. Inspire Customers: lululemon

Yogawear company lululemon is all about living well. The brand's Instagram stream captures yogis in impressive poses and preaches inspirational wisdom (see also: the lululemon manifesto), driving home the point that you can do anything when you put your mind to it. To many consumers, wearing Lululemon is akin to a badge of honor, practically saying, "my body is a temple, and it can do amazing things."

So a couple months ago, the brand partnered with Olapic to collect images from consumers that represent #TheSweatLife â€" users were asked to tweet or Instagram photos of them getting their sweat on, and these images are displayed on a subsection of the brand website. These crowdsourced pictures show people pushing the limits, contorting their bodies and exploring the world in lululemon gear; like the brand itself, these images are simultaneously inspirational and aspirational.

"We created the program as a way to connect with our guests and showcase how they are authentically sweating in our product offline," says Lesia Dallimore, brand manager at lululemon. "We see it as a unique way to bring their offline experiences into our online community."

In addition to #TheSweatLife, there are also hashtags for specific products, like #wunderunder or #groovepant. When you click on a picture tagged with one of these hashtags, the site directs you to product pages, where customers can easily purchase items shown in the photos.

To date, the brand has received more than 7,000 photos via Instagram and Twitter, and the main #sweatlife gallery has had more than 40,000 unique visitors since launch.

Lesson: A loyal community is a powerful thing â€" highlighting customers who live your brand makes others want to live your brand, too. Encourage customers to snap photos that capture your brand values, and synthesize them into a Facebook cover photo, a T-shirt design or art to decorate your store. When choosing a hashtag, include a key brand value with broad, organic applications (see also: Tiffany & Co.'s #TrueLovePictures and Nike's #MakeItCount).

2. Help Customers Find a Fit: Rent The Runway's #OurRunway

Rent the Runway lets you rent haute couture for weddings, birthday parties, prom and other highly photographed occasions. These also tend to be high-risk occasions, so women might be deterred from renting â€" what if a dress doesn't fit?

Rent the Runway found that many of its customers who did rent dresses had positive experience and uploaded photos to Facebook and Instagram to show off their stunning Cinderella moments â€" 12,000 of them, to be exact. The burgeoning startup decided to turn this organic crowdsourcing of photos into Our Runway, a campaign to celebrate real beauty and help each renter find a dress that works for her body (while also offering social proof of the renting concept).

Those who have rented are encouraged to upload an image and indicate their measurements and what size dress they wore, along with comments and feedback about the outfit. With this massive archive of images, prospective renters can use the "Find Women Like Me" tool to select their own measurements and see what dresses look like on people with their body type, as opposed to stick-thin models. It's a marketing move that works â€" members who have viewed these UGC photos are 200% more likely to rent than those who have viewed a product shot on a model.

"With Our Runway, we are creating a platform for the everyday woman to discover amazing styles that work best for her body, and forming a community that celebrates every woman's special moments," says RTR CEO and co-founder Jennifer Hyman. "It's empowering to see thousands of photos of diverse women of all ages, sizes and ethnicities feeling self-confident."

Lesson: Online shopping is far less daunting when buyers know what they're getting, and photos are more useful than text reviews when it comes to pre-purchase research. Showing "real people" wearing your product proves the popularity of your brand and makes the purchase less intimidating.

3. Find Your Superfans: Pepsi MAX's Max It Now

Jeff Gordon has some serious fans on social media, and to engage this crowd, Pepsi MAX â€" for whom Gordon is spokesperson â€" sought to find the ultimate superfan. The beverage brand replicated the format of NASCAR's Sprint Cup with a series of 24 social media challenges that asked fans to do things like tweet why they prefer Pepsi MAX to Coke Zero in 24 words and Instagram themselves with a MAX and #24 gear. Users earned points for how quickly they completed each task, and they won prizes (including TVs, gift cards, a year's supply of Pepsi MAX and die-cast cars), based on the quality of their posts.

After 24 challenges, the 10 most engaged users (based on point totals) went through four more challenges to vie for the grand prize, a trip to the Chase Race at Martinsville Speedway as a VIP Pepsi MAX correspondent to manage the brand's social channels and interview Jeff Gordon. Stephen Radford won the competition and blogged about his experiences on NASCAR.com (see his challenge entries here).

For Pepsi MAX, it was a win-win. The brand had more than 7,300 entrants and more than 700 images of Pepsi MAX cans posted to social sites. Meanwhile, the microsite had more than 52,000 visits, with a time-on-site average exceeding six minutes. And a Pepsi MAX rep says that, for a fairly reasonable price (compared to traditional sweepstakes), the brand was able to award prizes to "true fans," offer a fun month-long experience and inspire them to share Pepsi MAX and Jeff Gordon content with friends and followers. "Whereas traditional sweepstakes are a bit of a mystery and no one expects to win, with MAX It Now, we were able to be transparent about who was receiving prizes and why and gamified the whole experience," says the rep.

Lesson: Huge fans will go to great lengths to demonstrate their love for a brand. Don't be afraid to ask them to go out on a limb; you won't get a ton of responses, but finding your hardcore brand evangelists is more important than finding mediocre fans who are in it for the prize.

4. Let UGC Be the Product: Threadless

If two heads are better than one, then it probably makes sense to tap the collective creativity of a large community, right? That's exactly what the T-shirt company Threadless does. The Chicago-based printing company has a received 257,921 designs; since its founding in 2000, it's paid out $7,120,000 to $1,374 artists, who make money each time someone buys their design.

Artists and designers are encouraged to submit their files for scoring. For seven days, the Threadless community scores the design 1 to 5, leaving comments; that feedback helps the Threadless team decide what to print. When a design is selected, the artist gets cash upfront and then royalties based on the number of products sold with the design.

Threadless founder Jake Nickell's goal wasn't to build a multimillion dollar business, but to "give the creative minds of the world more opportunities to make and sell great art," he said in an interview.

Lesson: Good design is worth paying for, and crowdsourcing yields some incredible creativity. Consider a design contest for your new order of merch.

UGC and the Law

Before you jump in to a UGC campaign, make sure you're aware of the legal ramifications of using UGC. Joshua Sessler, a digital media and entertainment lawyer at Cowan DeBaets Abrahams & Sheppard LLP in New York, says that if you're going to have some sort of contest, the first thing you need to do is be extremely clear about whether it's a sweepstakes (random drawing) or a contest (some criteria involved).

Then, you ought to have very clear official rules â€" say where and how the winning material will be used, for example â€" and then you should be safe as long as you're in compliance with the rules you posted. In the submission widget, include some verbiage such as, "By submitting to this contest, I agree to these rules." (Since states and countries have different laws regarding contests, speak with a lawyer to ensure that you're in compliance.)

If you're going to solicit content on Facebook, that's a whole other beast â€" Facebook has its own strict rules. It's important to note that any promotion on Facebook needs to be administered within a Facebook app, so it may be easiest to use a third-party platform, like Offerpop or Strutta.

In addition to the initial rules, you should have winner(s) sign an affidavit, which authorizes your brand to use the winning materials post-contest. "If I'm a contestant, and I submit a piece of video, I want to know upfront what you're going to do with it [the rules]," says Sessler. "If I win, there's going to be a broad range of rights that I'm giving you â€" I'm giving up the right to exploit my content and control it past a certain point."

User-generated content can be a great tool in your marketing arsenal, but it can also be a legal mess if you're not thorough from the get-go. Do your legal research and be clear about how the UGC will be used, and respect the rights of the creators you're working with. After all, their material will likely help your brand make money!

Has your company used UGC? Tell us about your experiences in the comments.

More Small Business Resources From OPEN Forum

- How to Use Hashtags to Promote Your Small Business
- 10 Things You Didn't Know About Yelp
- How to Master Social Media Like a Famous Comedian

Images courtesy of lululemon, Rent the Runway, NASCAR

Read More

Listen to Coldplay if You Want to Stay Safe on the Road, Study Says

Want to stay safe on the road? Wear a seat belt, check your blindspots, avoid texting while driving and ... listen to Coldplay.

Strange as it may sound, the British band's soothing tunes could help you avoid accidents while driving. Coldplay's "The Scientist" landed on a list of "ultimate safe driving songs" compiled by Confused.com, the creator of driving app MotorMate.

From the data, London Metropolitan University professor Simon Moore concluded that the optimum music volume for driving is 55 to 65 decibels, while the ideal tempo should mimic the human heartbeat at around 60 to 80 beats per minute.

Based on Moore's findings, Confused.com created a safe-driving playlist that includes: Norah Jones' "Come Away With Me," Jason Mraz's "I'm Yours," Radiohead's "Karma Police" and Elton John's "Tiny Dancer." For more, check out the video above.

On the other side of the spectrum, Moore cautioned against listening to music that is noisy, upbeat and increases your heart rate. For example, drivers should avoid the Black Eyed Peas' "Hey Mama," which topped Confused.com's list of top 10 dangerous driving songs.

What do you listen to while driving? Tell us in the comments below.

Image via YouTube screenshot

Read More

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

U.S. Military Wants ‘Mission Impossible’ Self-Destructing Devices

Self-destructing tapes from the "Mission Impossible" TV series and films served fictional spies well during the Cold War. Today, the U.S. military wants a modern version of vanishing electronics that are able to disappear upon command in the environment or a human body.

The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is looking for such spy craft technology at a time when swarms of electronic sensors and communication devices already help U.S. troops hunt enemies, keep track of friendly forces and monitor threats from nuclear, biological or chemical weapons. Futuristic electronics able to self-destruct upon command would help prevent devices from falling into enemy hands and littering the environment.

"The [Vanishing, Programmable Resources] program seeks to address this pervasive challenge by developing electronic systems capable of physically disappearing in a controlled, triggerable manner," DARPA said in a special notice on Jan. 25.

Disposable electronics could either degrade into environmentally harmless substances or get absorbed into the human body if they act as biomedical implants, DARPA said. The idea could fit with another DARPA project aimed at making "nanosensors" capable of monitoring or even fixing the human body like a swarm of tiny doctors.

Lab versions of vanishing electronics already include microchip components, biomedical implants and even a 64-pixel digital camera. But DARPA points out that degradable electronics based on polymeric or biologically derived materials often perform worse than traditional electronics or prove less durable â€" a problem for U.S. military standards.

Researchers must also tackle the challenge of making a new generation of vanishing electronics that can self-destruct upon command, rather than simply building varieties that slowly disappear over time.

The "Vanishing, Programmable Resources" program has planned a Proposer's Day on Feb. 14 at the Capital Conference Center in Arlington, Va. â€" a day for researchers and companies to find out more about DARPA's vision of the future.

Photo courtesy of Flickr, DVIDSHUB

This article originally published at TechNewsDaily here

TechNewsDaily is a Mashable publishing partner that is an exciting new and accessible source of technology news and information for non-geeks seeking to learn about the cool gadgets, powerful software and unavoidable technologies of everyday life. This article is reprinted with the publisher's permission.

Read More

Disney’s ‘Wreck-It Ralph’ Promo Turns Street Into Pixelated Wonderland

Watch your step, man. You almost walked in (pixelated) dog poop.

In promotion for its newest animated film, Wreck-It Ralph, Disney transformed London's Brick Lane over the weekend into a pixel-themed street display called 8-Bit Lane.

The film, which is scheduled for release in the United Kingdom on Feb. 8, is about an arcade video game villain, Ralph, who rebels against his "bad guy" status to become a hero.

Reddit user robynkendal uploaded early images of the street on Saturday. The pictures show basic street elements such as pigeons, trees, taxi cabs and dogs, arranged as life-sized pixelated objects. One shows a giant poster, with Ralph's mugshot, overlooking the street with the phrase "Loading In Cinemas."

Disney tweeted out a link on Monday to a virtual tour of the whole set-up:

Reception of 8-Bit was positive across Twitter, with many fans referring to the street as a "stroll through a video game":

Wreck-It Ralph was nominated for a Golden Globe and an Academy Award, both under the category Best Animated Feature Film. It lost to Brave at the Golden Globes on Sunday; the Oscars air Feb. 24. The film was released in the U.S. on Nov. 2, 2012. It stars John C. Reilly, Jack McBrayer, Sarah Silverman and Jane Lynch.

Flip through the original Reddit gallery here.

What are the most creative marketing campaigns you've seen? Or, better yet, did you see 8-Bit Lane in person? Tell us what you think about it below.

Image courtesy of Reddit, robynkendal

Read More

Monday, January 28, 2013

SAG Awards Recap: Best Moments and Acceptance Speeches

Hugh Jackman and Anne Hathaway from Les Misérables used their airtime at the SAG Awards to give us a modern-day synopsis of the 19th century tale's movie adaptation.

"Wolverine is being chased by Gladiator; Catwoman gets knocked up and, for some ungodly reason, goes to see Bellatrix Lestrange from Harry Potter and Borat," they say. "And Wolverine agrees to raise Catwoman's baby. And she grows up to star in Mamma Mia."

If that sounds familiar, it's because it resembles a viral Facebook review of the flick.

The Les Misérables bit was among the highlights of Sunday's 19th Screen Actors Guild Awards, which honored motion picture and TV performances as voted on by peers.

Another standout moment was Tina Fey's acceptance speech â€" for Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Comedy Series â€" in which she thanked Amy Poehler.

"I've known you since you were pregnant with Lena Dunham (of HBO's Girls)," Fey quipped.

You can watch Fey's speech and other ones below, as well as see the full list of winners.

Movie Categories

Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Leading Role

  • Winner: Daniel Day-Lewis, Lincoln

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Leading Role

  • Winner: Jennifer Lawrence, Silver Linings Playbook

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Supporting Role

  • Winner: Tommy Lee Jones, Lincoln

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Supporting Role

  • Winner: Anne Hathaway, Les Miserables

  • Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture

  • Winner: Argo

  • Television Categories

    Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Television Movie or Miniseries

  • Winner: Kevin Costner, Hatfields & McCoys

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Television Movie or Miniseries

  • Winner: Julianne Moore, Game Change

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Drama Series

  • Winner: Bryan Cranston, Breaking Bad

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Drama Series

  • Winner: Claire Danes, Homeland

  • Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Comedy Series

  • Winner: Alec Baldwin, 30 Rock

  • Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Comedy Series

  • Winner: Tina Fey, 30 Rock

  • Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Drama Series

  • Winner: Downton Abbey

  • Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series

  • Winner: Modern Family

  • Other Categories

    Outstanding Action Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Motion Picture

  • Winner: Skyfall

  • Outstanding Action Performance by a Stunt Ensemble in a Television Series

  • Winner: Game of Thrones

  • Screen Actors Guild 49th Annual Life Achievement Award

  • Winner: Dick Van Dyke

  • Photo via Mark Hill/SAG Awards

    Read More

    Groupon Shelves All Its Gun-Related Deals

    Groupon has halted all of its gun-related promotions, the company said in a statement.

    "All scheduled and current gun-related deals featured on Groupon North America, including shooting ranges, conceal-and-carry and clay shooting, have been placed on hiatus while we review internal standards that shape the deal inventory we feature," Groupon spokesperson Julie Mossler told Daily Finance on Sunday.

    "The category is under review following recent consumer and merchant feedback."

    Although Groupon provided no further explanation for its decision, some commentators point to last month's shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Conn. for the sudden move. The tragedy, which left 26 people â€" including 20 children â€" dead, ignited a fierce debate on gun control in the United States.

    Texas gun-shop owner Michael Cargill called for a boycott of Groupon after it canceled his deal for a concealed-handgun training course, Daily Finance reported.

    A movement to boycott the discount website has since emerged online, including on Twitter.

    Groupon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    What do you think of Groupon's decision to suspend its gun-related deals? Discuss in the comments below.

    [via CNET]

    Image courtesy of Flickr, storem

    Read More

    Sunday, January 27, 2013

    Artist Looks for Drone Pilots on Craigslist, Gets Threatened by FBI

    An Israeli filmmaker attracted the attention of the FBI when he posted an ad on Craigslist, looking for U.S. drone pilots. While doing some research for his short film about drone strikes, 5,000 Feet Is The Best, Omer Fast posted an anonymous ad looking to talk to pilots based at Creech Air Force Base, one of the main bases where pilots remotely operate the flying bots from ground control stations (see the picture below).

    That's when the FBI called. "We were told to stop what we were doing and threatened in suggestive, spy-movie language," Fast told UK magazine Photoworks. The FBI was able to trace the ad back to Fast and his production team even though the ad was anonymous.

    "I imagine it's probably quite a routine thing for them to do but it sure took us by surprise because they had to trace our phone number via the IP address used to publish an otherwise anonymous ad on Craigslist," Fast told The Verge.

    The FBI's intervention didn't stop production, but it had some undesirable effects. "After the call, our contacts went dead," said Fast. In the end though, he was able to republish the ad and he didn't have any issues when he landed in the United States.

    The 30-minute film is not intended to be a documentary. Although it is based on two interviews with a real drone operator, the film also casts an actor to depict the operator, telling his story with flashbacks and fictional scenes reproducing drone strikes.

    Watch the video above to find out more about this story.

    Photo via Ethan Miller/Getty Images

    Read More

    Film Engages Millennials in Choice Dialogue on Roe v. Wade Anniversary

    On the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court's historic decision about a women's right to chose, the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws is kicking off a social-focused campaign targeting millennials. NARAL released the short film 40 on Tuesday to launch its new Choice Out Loud campaign.

    "40 is the beginning of a dialogue with a younger generation," Jeff Martin, 40's creative director told Mashable. "We're going to have millennials be the core of the voting population in the next 15 years, and the dialogue about women's reproductive rights is a different dialogue than it's been in the past."

    40 is a stop-motion portrait of choice, incorporating the work of 40 photographers who shot (pro-bono) 40 pro-choice millennial women to make the film. While some of the subjects are models, others are teachers, activists and students. Martin said the photographers were given the freedom to shoot between 60 and 80 stills of their subjects of choice.

    "We wanted to look at what choice looks like in America now," he said.

    The campaign aims to encourage a more personal and less political discussion about choice, NARAL said.

    "This is a very personal topic; people don't talk about this in terms of politics," said Tarek Rizk, NARAL's communications director. "We want to build a platform for a new conversation about choice, and find a place on the Internet for a conversation that's more personal and non-political. We're trying to meet people on their grounds, since there's new ways of thinking and new conversations happening."

    Following the film's launch, Choice Out Loud will be screened on college campuses across the country with the hope of sparking personal conversations about reproductive rights.

    Watch 40, above, and let us know in the comments what you think of the campaign.

    Image courtesy of NARAL

    Read More

    Saturday, January 26, 2013

    Wikileaks Says Aaron Swartz Was a Possible Source

    In a series of tweets, Wikileaks claimed Saturday that late Internet activist and hacker Aaron Swartz was an ally and possible source for the organization.

    It also disclosed that Swartz, who committed suicide last week, was "in communication" with founder Julian Assange during 2010 and 2011.

    Wikileaks, which exposes classified information provided by anonymous sources, said it decided to reveal these details in light of the U.S. Secret Service's involvement in Swartz's case. At the time of his death, Swartz was awaiting trial for allegedly harvesting millions of scholarly articles over the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's network. He was charged with computer fraud and other crimes in July 2011, and faced up to 35 years in prison.

    The Secret Service took over Swartz's case two days prior to his arrest, according The Verge.

    Although Wikileaks doesn't elaborate on its decision, the organization has a policy of maintaining anonymity for its sources.

    "As far as we can ascertain, Wikileaks has never revealed any of its sources," according to its website. "We cannot provide details about the security of our media organization or its anonymous drop box for sources because to do so would help those who would like to compromise the security of our organization and its sources."

    Check out Wikileaks' tweets about Swartz, below:

    [via The Verge]

    Image courtesy of Flickr, ragesoss

    Read More

    Google Officially Responds to Safari-Tracking Lawsuit

    Last winter, a Stanford researcher discovered Google was bypassing iPhone users’ privacy settings in the mobile Safari browser in order to serve them ads tailored to their browsing history. Even though Google apologized, paid $22.5 million in fines and chalked the whole thing up to a technical error, several people sued Google over the affair, which was consolidated into a class-action lawsuit.

    Now Google is asking the court to tell those people to get lost. The search giant filed an official motion to dismiss the lawsuit this week, stating the plaintiffs’ claims “lack standing,” mainly because they suffered no demonstrable injury over the ads, and that Google never obtained anyone’s personal information via the tracking.

    The case all comes down to cookies. Cookies, of course, are the snippets of code your browser uses to remember whether or not you’ve been to a site (or set of sites) before, helping to exchange things like login information. Cookies inform the site you’re browsing that you’re a returning visitor, and if it serves ads they can be tailored to your browsing history.

    The thing is, ads often serve your browser their own cookies, separate from the site you’re on, in order to track you on their network. Those are what’s called third-party cookies, and since lots of people are creeped out by them (just search for “Do Not Track”), many browsers offer a way to opt out of receiving those cookies. Apple’s mobile Safari is one such browser.

    What happened, according to Google, is that it used a common developer technique that lets it bypass those user preferences to serve cookies â€" even when the user has opted out â€" to ensure things like the Google+ “+1” buttons that appear on third-party sites still work. Now, because of the way this exception works, once any cookie from a specific domain is allowed, they’re all let in. But that’s OK since Google and its ad network use different domains.

    Here’s where the problem began, as Google explains it: When it introduced Google+ in 2011, it also created a way for users to highlight specific ads on Google they liked. To let users do this while still remaining anonymous, Google had to create a new kind of “intermediary” cookie, which also bypassed user preferences.

    However, not all of Google’s developers were up to speed on Safari’s “let ‘em all in” policy on cookies, and these new cookies use the ad-network domain. Because of that oversight, Google’s ad network suddenly had backdoor approval to put tailored ads in front of a whole slew of Google+ users who never gave that permission in the first place.

    Of course the problem was spotted, Google apologized (and supposedly fixed it) and was fined a record $22.5 million by the FTC, and the lawsuits began. Users cried shenanigans, not buying that the world’s largest ad network somehow served them ads by mistake. In the lawsuit, they claim damages related to their personal information being used to add value to the ads served by Google.

    Google says that’s bunk. In its motion, it (correctly) points out cookies by their nature don’t carry personal information, and that when they do things such as help a browser automatically log into a site, that’s only possible because the user had at some point in the past deliberately provided that site with the information.

    The plaintiffs also claim Google benefited from serving them ads, and they should be compensated as such. Google is persuasive in its filing when it says any affected users suffered “no harm,” but the act of serving tailored ads certainly has some value, otherwise the technology wouldn't exist at all.

    Is that value enough to justify real damages in a lawsuit? That’s up to the judge, and if Google fails at getting the case tossed, the world may see the first serious trial over “Do Not Track.” No word on when the judge will rule, but we’re staying tuned.

    In the meantime, let us know what you think of the case in the comments. Google’s filing is below.

    Google Motion to Dismiss Safari Tracking Lawsuit by

    Image courtesy of iStockphoto, gmutlu

    Read More

    Friday, January 25, 2013

    Can Virtual Classrooms Recreate a Traditional College Experience?

    The burgeoning online education scene is a practical option to a traditional college education for a number of reasons â€" cost, convenience and efficiency. And for professors it offers a consistent classroom format.

    A number of online education sites say the goal is not to be a substitute for the classroom experience, but to offer an even more collaborative learning environment, while also making education convenient and accessible for everyone â€" whether you're taking a couple college courses or learning for the fun of it. In light of recent news about a partnership between a California state school and an online education site, it's possible that because of the high cost of education, online learning could become the norm for college students.

    But can an online classroom teach you the social and collaborative skills that real-life, in-class experiences impart?

    Mashable recently covered the big news that San Jose State University in California was implementing three new online courses for freshmen. Granted, it is a limited trial in partnership with online education platform Udacity, but it's the state's first partnership that could lead to an official online program in all California state schools. In a school system where four courses is a full course load (12 credits), freshmen could take three of their four (or more) courses online and, perhaps, lose out on the typical college experience.

    Dr. Katherine Cohen, CEO and founder of IvyWise, spoke to Mashable for the article about SJSU's online classes and said MOOC (massive open online courses) give students who may never have been able to consider college access to university classes. But, she allowed, "there's certainly something to be said for the college experience. College is where students build their social and professional networks, ones they will rely upon throughout the rest of their lives. Students living on campus also tend to mature much more quickly, as they take on new responsibilities and maintain a new level of independence."

    On the other hand, students without the budget for a typical college education, or students who don't want to go into copious amounts of debt, working students or students with children might benefit from taking college courses online.

    Alison Johnston, CEO of InstaEDU, an online tutoring platform, tells Mashable the industry-wide dilemma for those in online education is getting people to complete the course.

    She said there have been numerous reports about people not completing MOOCs in particular. Johnson says to overcome this hurdle, companies in this space will have to offer an online experience to make web-based education have all the features of a real-life college education. On a side note: others have countered that MOOC dropout rates are high because the bar is low to enter the programs and many people sign-up, some without a strong intent to even take the course. Also, the college-level coursework weeds out a lot of people.

    "In the real world, you have the teacher, the TA and fellow classmates," she says. "I think you're going to see companies come in and fill this space."

    Sites like Coursera are the classroom and teacher; InstaEDU and other tutoring sites are the teacher's aide (TA); and sites like Piazza and OpenStudy act as virtual study groups, she explains.

    Andrew Ng, the cofounder of Coursera, says they recognize that online education is not a replacement for the real classroom experience, "which is extremely valuable beyond knowledge sharing for reasons of social interaction, one-on-one learning and more."

    He sees their service as an alternative to not having higher education at all, which is a reality for many people due to their location, budget or job. And also as an enhancement to on-campus learning that complements traditional classroom formats. Still, the site tries to offer as many personal interactions among its users as possible. Coursera has nearly 2,000 in-person meet-up groups; professors on the site are also known to host these groups from time to time.

    "For the most part, online-based education is equivalent [to a traditional college education]. Students can learn in either setting," Cathy Sandeen, vice president for education attainment and innovation at the American Council on Education (ACE), tells Mashable.

    Online courses are not going to be exactly like real-life courses, Sandeen says. But most college students are not, in reality, how we picture the typical college student. Only 25% of university students are in their late teens to early twenties and entered college right after high school. The remander participate at other times in their lives, making online courses convenient.

    And the online class model mirrors today's work environment, she adds, with groups from around the country or world working together online.

    MOOC classes can also provide an in-person experience. Sandeen said she recently took a MOOC course with 30,000 students from all over the world. There were enough students in the course that regional study groups were formed.

    "It doesn't have to be an either/or," she adds. "What we're seeing is a lot of traditional institutions incorporating online classes."

    It seems online classes, particularly MOOC classes, have a high drop-out rate, but for students who appreciate the convenience and cost, online courses could open doors to a college education.

    How would you like to see online education woven into the traditional college education setting? Tell us in the comments.

    Photo courtesy of iStockphoto, tumpikuja

    Read More

    Hands On With Twitter’s Social Video App, Vine

    Twitter launched Vine on Thursday â€" an app that lets you share 6-second video clips.

    Currently iOS-only, the stop-motion videos can include as many scenes as you can fit in. Video stops and starts when you press on your device’s screen. Your finished product can then be shared just on Vine, or with friends on Twitter or â€" in theory â€" Facebook.

    Still in its infancy, the service isn’t without drawbacks. Sharing for instance can only be done with the video is initially uploaded/. So if you forget to select that Twitter button when you upload your followers will be out of luck forever.

    Thursday at least, uploading those videos to social networks also takes a bit of time. Some of our videos went up immediately, while others took close to an hour.

    Sound is also recorded along with each video clip. While that’s not a huge deal if you’re recording in a quiet location, video recorded where there’s a lot of noise can sound choppy and be jarring for viewers. (Videos play automatically in Twitter, but the default setting appears to be on mute.)

    And then there’s Twitter's relationship with Facebook. A few hours after the app’s launch Thursday Facebook blocked the service from being able to access your friends lists.

    Knowing which of your Facebook friends are using Vine isn’t essential to the service, but it does tend to make finding those friends â€" who you might not be connected to on Twitter â€" that much harder.

    Have you tried Vine out yet? Let us know what you think about the app in the comments.

    Mashable Thumbnail, Emily Price

    Read More

    Thursday, January 24, 2013

    Free Database of the Entire Web May Spawn the Next Google

    Google famously started out as little more than a more efficient algorithm for ranking web pages. But the company also built its success on crawling the web â€" using software that visits every page in order to build up a vast index of online content.

    A nonprofit called Common Crawl is now using its own web crawler and making a giant copy of the web that it makes accessible to anyone. The organization offers up more than 5 billion web pages, available for free so that researchers and entrepreneurs can try things otherwise possible only for those with access to resources on the scale of Google’s.

    "The web represents, as far as I know, the largest accumulation of knowledge, and there’s so much you can build on top,” says entrepreneur Gilad Elbaz, who founded Common Crawl. “But simply doing the huge amount of work that’s necessary to get at all that information is a large blocker; few organizations … have had the resources to do that."

    New search engines are just one of the things that can be built using an index of the web, says Elbaz, who points out that Google’s translation software was trained using online text available in multiple languages. “The only way they could do that was by starting with a massive crawl. That’s put them on the way to build the Star Trek translator,” he says. “Having an open, shared, corpus of human knowledge is simply a way of democratizing access to information that’s fundamental to innovation.”

    Elbaz says he noticed around five years ago that researchers with new ideas about how to use Web data felt compelled to take jobs at Google because it was the only place they could test those ideas. He says Common Crawl’s data will make it easier for novel ideas to gain traction, both in the world of startups and in academic research.

    Elbaz is the founder and CEO of big data company Factual, and before that founded a company bought by Google to be the basis of its ad business for webpages. Common Crawl also has Google’s director of research, Peter Norvig, and MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito on its advisory board.

    Common Crawl has so far indexed more than 5 billion pages, adding up to 81 terabytes of data, made available through Amazon’s cloud computing service. For about $25 a programmer could set up an account with Amazon and get to work crunching Common Crawl data, says Lisa Green, Common Crawl’s director. The Internet Archive, another nonprofit, also compiles a copy of the web and offers a service called the “Wayback Machine” that can show old versions of a particular page. However, it doesn’t allow anyone to analyze all its data at once in that way.

    Common Crawl has already inspired or helped out some new web startups. TinEye, a “reverse” search engine that finds images similar to one provided by the user, made use of early Common Crawl data to get started. One programmer’s personal project using Common Crawl data to measure how many of the web's pages connect to Facebook â€" some 22%, he concluded â€" led to his securing funding for a startup, Lucky Oyster, based on helping people find useful information in their social data.

    Other ideas enabled by the project emerged from a contest run last year that awarded prizes for the best use cases. One of the winners used Wikipedia links in crawl data to build a service capable of defining the meanings of words; another tried to determine public attitudes toward congressional legislation by analyzing the content of online discussions about new laws.

    Rich Skrenta, cofounder and CEO of search engine startup Blekko, says Common Crawl’s data fulfills a definite need in the startup community. He says Blekko has been approached by startups with technology needing access to large collections of online data. “That kind of data is now easily available from Common Crawl,” says Skrenta, whose company contributed some of its own data to the project in December 2012. Blekko shared information from its system that categorizes Web pages by content, for example labeling whether they contain pornography or spam.

    Ben Zhao, an assistant professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who uses large collections of web data for research into activity on social sites, says Common Crawl’s data is likely unique.

    "Fresh, large-scale crawls are quite rare, and I am not personally aware of places to get large crawl data on the web," he says.

    However, Zhao notes that some of the most interesting and valuable parts of the web won’t be well represented in Common Crawl’s data: "Social sites are quite sensitive about their content these days, and many implement anti-crawling mechanisms to limit the speed anyone can access their content."

    To access this data, researchers must strike up relationships with companies and rely on whatever they will release â€" a route less available to startups who may be seen as competition.

    Image courtesy of Flickr, Creativity103

    This article originally published at MIT Technology Review here

    Read More

    Fitness Gadgets: Cheaper Than a Gym Membership?

    No one ever said staying or getting fit was easy â€" or cheap.

    There are so many fitness tracking gadgets to chose from these days, and many more reasons why you might want one. Wearable trackers offer convenience and constant motivation. But price-wise, how do they compare to your gym membership? How do they compare to each other?

    Nike+ Kinect, naturally, wants to convince you its Xbox-based system is an effective price proposition. Below is their gym cost infographic; we've gone further and added the details and cost of other fitness gadgets.

    The fee listed for an average gym membership seems high to us (living in San Francisco, I still pay slightly less than that and go to a pretty good gym). A spokesperson for Nike+ Kinect said they were surprised at the high number â€" but when they factored in high-end gyms (like Equinox), it added up.

    A site called Statistics Brain suggests the average gym cost is $55 per month, seconding that information. Also, keep in mind many gyms have an initiation charge of about $100.

    We also compiled a cost breakdown of gadgets and game consoles that you can use in place of, or along with, your gym routine. And this isn't an either/or situation, you can take your Fitbit tracker or LINK armband to the gym, or workout using Wello while you're on vacation.

    Check out how the prices of these gadgets and consoles compare:

    • Wii Fit: The Wii Fit requires you to buy the Wii console, plus a balance board. The console costs about $165 and the board retails for about $100. The Wii Fit will certainly make you sweat, and it's a lot of fun. You can workout with up to 8 people, so long as everyone has a balance board. It comes with preloaded workouts, like yoga and strength training.

    • larklife: From company Lark, the larklife is a two-wristband system to track your steps/calories burned, and another to track your sleep. The larklife system comes with a daytime band, a nighttime band, one larklife core (the brains that you move from the day to the night band), a micro-USB charging cord, a USB AC adaptor and syncs to the free larklife app for iOS devices. It retails for $150.

    • Fitbit: This company offers a number of fitness trackers that all sync using Bluetooth to the free mobile and web applications. The Fitbit Zip costs monitors steps, distance and calories burned. It costs $60. The Fitbit One tracks what the Zip does, plus stairs and you can wear it at night to track your sleep. It costs $100. Launching this spring is the Fitbit Flex, a wristband that monitors activity and sleep. It costs about $100.

    • MOVband: You wear this tracker like a watch; you can even buy changeable wristbands for about $5 each to mix-up the colors. The MOVband tracks all your movements and syncs that data (via USB) to your free online account where you can monitor your activity level. The tracker costs $30.

    • Nike+ Kinect: Kinect for Xbox 360 is a pretty intuitive device. It uses a sensor to read your steps, so unlike the Wii, no board is needed. Just place the Kinect on a shelf by your TV or on your media stand facing you. Combine that technology with Nike's fitness know-how and you have a kick-butt at-home workout. Create a custom workout on Nike+ Kinect that matches your fitness level. It retails for $50, and the Xbox 360 plus the Kinect devices costs as low as $99 plus a two year contract for about $15 per month, or buying the Xbox 360 4GB with the Kinect without a contract costs about $300.

    • Wello: This is not a gadget or device, but a website where you can connect with a personal trainer and workout together live via video chat. It's important both people have a good Internet connection for this to work. Training sessions are offered in 30 or 60 minute sessions, and prices depend on the level of training the instructor has and range from $19-119 per session.

    • BodyMedia LINK: The LINK armband is the only armband BodyMedia sells with Bluetooth (a must-have feature on a tracker). The LINK counts steps, calorie burned, sleep and it can sync to a heart rate monitor. It retails for about $150. You can sync the data the LINK tracks to the free SparkPeople website, a massive community of fitness enthusiasts, where you'll also find lots of health and fitness information. Or to the free BodyMedia FIT app on your iPhone or Android device. BodyMedia also gives you three months free access to its web application as part of the LINK purchase price. If you want to continue using the web app after three months it costs $7 per month.

    • Up by Jawbone: This waterproof wristband tracks sleep and exercise habits. You can also track calories by entering food items, or for a faster way to record your eating habits, Up lets you take pictures of your meals and write how you felt afterwards. It retails for $129.99. There have been complaints, though, that the end cap on the wristband falls off easily. And you need to take the cap off when charging or syncing the device (it does not have Bluetooth). The iOS app has a 4+ rating, and reviews for the Up are mixed on Amazon (keep in mind the newest model seems to have much better reviews that the original).

    • Nike+ FuelBand: This wristband tracks your activity level with an accelerometer. You can set a goal and monitor how close you are to reaching that goal through the app. The data from the wristbands syncs to a several apps. It costs $150.

    Have you swapped your gym membership for a fitness gadget? Do you use both? Tell us in the comments.

    Photo courtesy of iStockphoto, kzenon

    Read More

    Wednesday, January 23, 2013

    500px Removal Highlights App Store Inequalities

    Mashable OP-ED

    The removal of 500px from Apple's App Store raises questions over review equity, fairness and API functionality.

    When Evgeny Tchebotarev started the day, he wasn't expecting to end up spending so much time fielding calls from the media. Tchebotarev is the COO and co-founder of 500px, a popular photo site and community for professional and amateur photographers.

    Yet that's exactly what happened after Apple removed the 500px app from the App Store. After more than 16 months in the App Store and over 1 million downloads, a routine app update had unintended consequences.

    On Monday night, Tchebotarev tells Mashable that he received a call from Apple. There was a problem with 500px. Like many other apps with photo communities, including Tumblr and Flickr, some of the photographers who use 500px use it to take photographs that contain nudity â€" not pornographic images, but nudity nonetheless.

    According to Tchebotarev, Apple reps told him that it was too easy for users to find nude photos using the app. As a result, the app was in violation of Apple's content policy and would be removed from the App Store. Tchebotarev offered to make the necessary changes to the app to comply with Apple's rules, but it was too late. As of Tuesday morning, 500px was gone from the App Store.

    A few hours later, TechCrunch reported on the story. Other outlets followed, including CNET, MacRumors and The Verge. Soon, the story was viral.

    The general reaction from both 500px employees and app users was disbelief. For one thing, 500px actually makes it difficult for new users to browse or search for nude photos. A user who signs up using the app can't see those types of photos; instead, he or she must log in through their desktop, and turn off a safe-search setting.

    For another, 500px is hardly the only app that could potentially expose users to nude images. Web browsers â€" including Apple's Safari â€" can display nude photos of all types. Plus, the aforementioned Tumblr and Flickr apps are much easier to use to track down nudes. To add insult to injury, while 500px is gone, a dozen apps that use 500px's API and replicate the functionality of the official app are still available.

    Then, Apple released its own statement on the matter. It said:

    "The app was removed from the App Store for featuring pornographic images and material, a clear violation of our guidelines. We also received customer complaints about possible child pornography. We've asked the developer to put safeguards in place to prevent pornographic images and material in their app."

    This statement was confusing to Tchebotarev and other 500px execs because it was the first any of them had heard about complaints regarding "possible child pornography." Apple never mentioned that to the company before pulling the app, Tchebotarev said.

    He added that 500px has made the necessary changes to its app, and re-submitted to the App Store. With any luck, the app will be back in the store very soon.

    Normally, this is where the news story would end. But what the 500px incident showcases, however, is that although more than four years have passed since the App Store opened, Apple's app-review process is still occasionally hampered by incongruities and unclear policies.

    App Rating Fairness

    My initial guess was that 500px was removed for not having the correct content rating. Apple assigns content ratings to apps to give users an idea of who the app is suitable for.

    A rating of 4+ means that there is no objectionable content in the app; a 9+ means there might be cartoon violence; a 12+ means there may be infrequent or mild sexual content/nudity and mild violence; and a 17+ means the app may contain heavy violence and mature themes.

    These content ratings can be arbitrary at best. Tumblr has a rating of 4+ despite the fact that it's very easy to find hardcore pornographic images using the tag search function within the app. Third-party web browsers such as Chrome and iCab have 17+ ratings because they can be used to access any site on the Internet (assuming it doesn't use Flash).

    Before Monday's incident, 500px had a content rating of 4+. Tchebotarev told me that the copy of the app in the submission queue has a rating of 12+.

    Based on feedback he's heard from other developers, Tchebotarev's theory is that Apple's review team (a team that is notoriously overworked) doesn't always check to ensure that apps have the proper content rating. Instead, it takes a series of complaints or a particularly conscientious review-team member to force an app to change its rating.

    This makes sense to me. Still, I'm utterly unsure how Tumblr, of all apps, has managed to avoid even a 12+ rating.

    What About APIs?

    Another issue raised with the 500px case is the role of an API within the app-review process.

    Apple initially said it was going to pull Pulpfingers' ISO500 app from the App Store. 500px acquired Pulpfingers (and ISO500, by extension) last month.

    As of this writing, ISO500 is still in the App Store, and doesn't appear to have been pulled.

    It wasn't clear why ISO500 was going to be removed, but some pundits worried that it was because the app uses 500px's API. The API allows read-access to the site and search, including, presumably, access to nude photos.

    This opens up an interesting question when it comes to third-party apps that use 500px's API, such as Flipboard. Flipboard can do virtually everything the official 500px and the ISO500 apps can do (at least, as far as displaying content), so would it be at risk?

    Right now, that seems unlikely, but it does raise some interesting questions that few of us have considered over the years: Is an app that plugs into another app's API going to be rated based on the functionality of that API?

    It's unclear.

    Waiting For a Resolution

    At the time of this writing, 500px is still missing from the App Store. While I fully expect the app to appear within the next day or two, I can't help but feel empathy for the startup caught in the middle of this.

    What do you think of the latest App Store hijinx? Let us know in the comments below.

    Read More

    38 Digital Media Resources You May Have Missed

    Another busy week is wrapping up, with big announcements from MySpace and Facebook, as well as shocking revelations from Lance Armstrong and Manti Te'o. If you missed any tech and social-media news, this weekend is the perfect time to catch up.

    Luckily, Mashable has got you covered. We've compiled a list of the most important stories from the last seven days, including information on new apps, social-media updates and digital resources. So, sit back, relax and read on.

    Editor's Picks

    Social Media

    For more social media news and resources, you can follow Mashable's social media channel on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

    Business & Marketing

    For more business news and resources, you can follow Mashable's business channel on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

    Tech & Mobile

    For more tech news and resources, you can follow Mashable's tech channel on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

    Lifestyle

    Image courtesy of iStockphoto, akinbostanci

    Read More

    Tuesday, January 22, 2013

    Justin Timberlake’s New Song ‘Suit & Tie’ Breaks Records

    Singer Justin Timberlake strolled into the record books with "Suit & Tie," the 'N Sync alumnus' first single since 2006.

    The song, which came out Jan. 13, ranked number 14 on Billboard's Pop Songs radio airplay chart with the most debut-week plays ever in the U.S. since the chart's creation in 1992.

    Billboard notes that the ranking for "Suit & Tie" is the highest debut rank by a solo male artist.

    The first-week radio spins for "Suit & Tie" totaled 9,394, according to RCA Records. It had the largest first-week audience of 93.4 million people, airplay monitor Mediabase reports.

    Meanwhile, RCA Records also says Timberlake sold 310,078 digital singles of "Suit & Tie" (featuring Jay-Z), which marks his best premiere-week sales ever, for a song. It reportedly reached the top spot on iTunes' singles charts in 31 countries.

    Timberlake had teased a musical comeback only several days before releasing the song on iTunes on the same night as the Golden Globes.

    In conjunction with the release, he put this letter on Countdown.JustinTimberlake.com:

    I hope this gets to you the right way. It's the only way I know to do it. Some people may criticize me for the last 3 days. But it was fun, right?? Right?!?! Besides, I'd rather speak directly to all of you. And, who can knock me for having a little bit of fun with it?

    Well... No more teasing. Although, it was A LOT of fun. (Did I mention that I'm having fun with this?? Ha!)

    *Makes a serious face*

    This year is an exciting one for me. As you probably have heard through the "grapevine," I'm gearing up for a big 2013.

    Back in June of last year, I quietly started working on what is now, my next journey with that thing I love called MUSIC.

    The inspiration for this really came out of the blue and to be honest, I didn't expect anything out of it. I just went into the studio and started playing around with some sounds and songs. It was probably the best time I've had in my career... Just creating with no rules and/or end goal in mind and really enjoying the process.

    What I came up with is something I couldn't be more excited about! It is full of inspiration that I grew up listening to and some newfound muses that I've discovered along the way.

    I'm calling it "The 20/20 Experience," and it's coming out this year.

    I hope you enjoy listening to it as much as I enjoyed making it.

    That's all I'm giving you for now... I know, I know! Again, with the teasing!!!

    Get ready. This is going to be fun (well, at least it is for me).

    Image via New.Myspace.com

    Read More

    Monday, January 21, 2013

    Here’s What Google’s Eric Schmidt Said About North Korea

    Not everyone was happy with Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt's trip to North Korea or its secretive nature. Now we have details about what the whole thing was about.

    Schmidt posted on his Google+ account this morning, and said the goal was to talk to North Korea about a free and open Internet. The reason many people suspected Schmidt was making the trip was to increase Google's market into the country, but why can't it be both? Google would no doubt get one of its many fingers into an open North Korean Internet, so it could be a classic win-win for Google and the North Korean people.

    In his Google+ post, Schmidt said that he was shown the mostly Linux-based software and technology that controlled the supervised Internet in North Korea, and mentioned that only the government, military, and universities had access to it.

    When Schmidt said the Internet was supervised, it seems he meant it literally.

    When Schmidt said the Internet was supervised, it seems he meant it literally. He wrote, "There is a supervised Internet and a Korean Intranet. (It appeared supervised in that people were not able to use the Internet without someone else watching them). There's a private intranet that is linked with their universities. Again, it would be easy to connect these networks to the global Internet."

    It seems like to use the Internet in North Korea at all, someone has to physically stand over your shoulder and watch what you are doing. That adds a real level of tension when you're trying to communicate about sensitive subjects, or watch adorable cat videos.

    There is an existing 3G network in the country, but it is not currently connected to the Internet. Making that connection, Schmidt says, would be "very easy" and he notes that there are already one and half million phones in the country that would be able to access the Internet through a 3G connection, with growth planned in the future.

    Schmidt obviously has something to gain by North Korea opening up the Internet, since it's likely that citizens would start using some Google products, but he also says it's good for North Korea itself to open up. Schmidt wrote, "As the world becomes increasingly connected, the North Korean decision to be virtually isolated is very much going to affect their physical world and their economic growth. It will make it harder for them to catch up economically."

    An open Internet allows growth and communication, and Schmidt says that if North Korea doesn't open its Internet to citizens they will fall behind.

    [Via Google+]

    Photo via Getty Images/AFP, Ed Jones

    This article originally published at Geekosystem here

    Read More
    Powered By Blogger · Designed By Mashable Articles